People with diabetes, heart failure and other chronic diseases often live independent lives, without a traditional caregiver. But many have a family member or friend who plays a key supporting role in their health care.
A new study finds that many of these “health supporters” wish they could understand their loved one’s condition better, or get more involved in helping them navigate a long-term illness. It also reveals that many aren’t getting the information or access from health providers that they need to do so.
In a new paper published in the journal Families, Systems and Health, a team from the University of Michigan, University of Pittsburgh and VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System reports the results of a national survey of more than 700 adults who said they helped at least one adult family member or friend manage a common chronic illness.
The survey focused on those who assisted with tasks related to medications, medical appointments, health care forms and cooking healthy food.
The results suggest that there’s a pent-up need for health care teams to involve such supporters more in their loved ones’ care, if the patient is willing.
“A lot of people who are providing this kind of care don’t think of themselves as caregivers, but the average adult with chronic illness gets a lot of support from family and close friends,” says Ann-Marie Rosland, M.D., M.S., who co-led the study while at U-M and is now at Pittsburgh.
“Past studies have shown the people with chronic conditions who have more support from family and friends are more successful in managing their health,” she says. “So it’s important to understand more about what these health supporters are doing, and what they need from health care providers.”
Time and effort, at home or from afar
The team, based at the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation and the VA Center for Clinical Management Research, explored data from health supporters who helped at least one adult loved one manage at least one chronic condition from a list that included diabetes, heart diseases, chronic lung diseases, depression and arthritis.
On average, these health supporters spent two hours a week helping their loved ones with health matters, most doing it from outside the patient’s home and half from more than 20 miles away.
Just over 20 percent went into the examination room at their loved one’s health appointments, and an equal percentage spoke to their health provider on the phone. The supporters were a mix of patients’ parents, spouses, siblings, other relatives and friends; just under 7 percent were the patient’s adult children. Most were over age 50.
Many health supporters reported helping with issues critical to patients with chronic disease.
Nearly half said they had talked with their loved one about the side effects of their medication, and nearly a third said they had talked about problems paying for those medications — both key issues that can cause people with chronic illness to cut back or stop taking important medicines that can ward off problems in the long term. Three-quarters had talked to their loved ones about pain or bothersome symptoms.
“We were surprised by the extent to which these chronic disease health supporters are able to provide support for key aspects of health care, and the sheer amount of help they provide,” says lead author Aaron A. Lee, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow at the VA CCMR. “But we were also surprised by their concerns about not being involved in their loved ones’ care by health providers.”
For instance, 41 percent of the respondents said they didn’t feel they knew enough about their loved one’s condition and treatment regimen to be able to help them as much as they needed. And only about 12 percent worried that they were getting too involved in their loved one’s health.
Connecting with health providers — or not
The researchers then focused on the 45 percent of supporters who said they had had contact with their loved one’s health providers.
While more than two-thirds of these supporters said that their loved one’s health care providers had answered questions for them, less than half said those providers involved them in health decisions or suggested ways they could help. About a third said providers were not willing to share information with them, perhaps missing opportunities for the providers to hear about side effects and symptoms the health supporters noticed.
Rosland notes that providers may shy away from involving health supporters in these ways because of time constraints or concerns about privacy — or because they never asked the patient if someone close to them helps support them.
Just asking this question, and asking whether the patient wants to bring that person to an appointment or allow the doctor or nurse to talk to them, is an important first step, she says. The federal health privacy law, called HIPAA, allows patients to designate individuals allowed to receive information about their condition and care.
Improving communication
With online access to individual medical record and appointment systems becoming more common, even family members who live miles away can be effective health supporters, Rosland notes.
But providers’ office staff and others must be trained to ask patients if they want to grant someone access to their health information online or through discussions with the care team. Such questions could be added to the screening questionnaires that increasingly ask patients about “social determinants of health,” and other aspects of their lives that could affect their ability to care for themselves, researchers say.
Patients who are competent to manage their own care should always have the right to decide what kind of family involvement they want, Lee and Rosland note. That includes young adults whose parents helped manage their chronic conditions when they were minors, but now have the legal right to make their own decisions about whether they still want that involvement.
For patients with complex health conditions who desire family involvement in their care, “health insurers could consider reimbursing providers for phone or in-person encounters with patients’ family members,” says Rosland. Providers that receive additional payments for population management or care coordination could use some of those resources to coordinate care with health supporters who are playing key roles in chronically ill patients’ health management.
Once family members and friends are involved in a patient’s chronic disease management, they may need training and support to help them have the most positive impact on patients, the researchers note.
For instance, learning how to talk to a parent about her diabetes, or helping a spouse manage his heart failure medicines, could improve the quality of the support family members give. Lee is studying the effect of health supporters’ communication styles on patients’ health outcomes, and Lee and Rosland are leading studies in the VA to examine the best ways to design and provide training in effective communication to patients and their health supporters.
In addition to Lee and Rosland, the paper’s authors are IHPI members John D. Piette, Ph.D.; Michele Heisler, M.D., MPA; Mary Janevic, MPH, Ph.D.; and Kenneth M. Langa, M.D., Ph.D. The research was supported by the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research and Michigan Center for Diabetes Translational Research.
Chronic disease management and population disparities in pain and pain treatment
Found in